Skip to main content

Argerich in Chopin's Ballade No. 3, Op. 47 in A-Flat Major

Someone recently put up a recording of Argerich playing this piece on YouTube, which I believe is the only one of its kind. Looking at Argerich's concert history, she seems to have played the A-Flat Ballade several times (always live), but I don't know which performance this is. Judging by the sound quality of this (putatively) pirate recording, I'd say this was performed in the 70s. I could be wrong, of course, but the 1970s is the uppermost possible bound. Which means that Argerich was in her prime. Excellent.

The sound quality is poor, because it was almost certainly recorded from the audience, and the tone of the piano is probably a bit harsher than it would have sounded to the people who were actually present. Nevertheless, the effortless poetry of Argerich's youth is clearly there, as well as the instinctive phrasing that I alluded to in one of my recent entries.

One of my favorite passages in this piece is the A-flat/E-flat interlude that occurs toward the end of the middle section (around the 3:32 mark in the video linked above). No two pianists (except, I suppose, bad ones) seem to play this passage in the same way, and there are many valid interpretations. Argerich is especially insouciant in this passage, tending slightly to Rachmaninoff's quirky exuberance (as opposed to Horowitz's more stately and dance-like reading), but with a more evanescent feeling. Sviatoslav Richter and Eileen Joyce are also amazing.

All in all, this is a great performance. Considerably better than Argerich's first Ballade, which has the unfair disadvantage of existing in two unflattering recordings (the first for being rather early in her career, and the second for being recorded by someone who thought it would be a good idea to place his microphone at the bottom of his backpack). The tempo is a bit fast (she plays in 6 minutes and 14 seconds what many play in upwards of 7 minutes), but it does not sound rushed, unlike her 1981 performance of the first Ballade and both performances of the third Scherzo from 2000.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Eileen Joyce Playing de Schlozer

It is safe to say that Eileen Joyce, one of the finest pianists of the last century, whose untimely departure from the concert stage and the recording studio sadly deprived her of the enduring fame and recognition that other pianists of the same caliber reaped in copious amounts, rose to prominence because of her studio recording of Paul de Schlozer's Etude in A-flat, about which I've already written at length on this blog. The story goes that Eileen Joyce, then not a professional musician, walked into the recording studio and recorded the de Schlozer etude, simply because she wanted to see how she sounded. She was signed on the spot. The famous recording of the de Schlozer etude was made in one take and went on to become the most celebrated recording of the piece. However, true to today's fashion of deprecating art and exalting pure technical accuracy, it is not uncommon to see people claim that Joyce's playing of the etude is "labored" compared to Geoffrey...

The Infuriating 'Un

This is something of a sequel to my post entitled the lugubrious gondola , in which I shall talk about why I find Beethoven so infuriating, when the rest of the world exalts him as music itself. (The nineteenth century conductor and Liszt pupil Hans von Bülow famously designated him as one of The Three Bs , whom he considered the only composers in history who were not cretins, if his word be taken at face value, alongside Bach and Brahms, rudely ousting Berlioz from his former place in that venerable trinity. Berlioz was probably put there in the first place because they couldn't find any other composer whose name started with B. An amusing anecdote: von Bülow was such an intellectual musician that he once conducted Beethoven's ninth symphony twice in a row so that his vulgar, uncultured audience, whose attention was limited by their vulgarity and unculturedness, could fully appreciate the greatness of that work. That's about as funny as musicology gets.) ...

Chopin's G Minor Ballade as played by V. Horowitz [Review]

Horowitz's interpretation of this piece changed little over the years - to the extent that his 1965 and his 1968 recordings of the piece are indistinguishable except upon closer inspection. I find that his rubati in the introduction are exaggerated and a little indecisive. His execution of the main theme is, however, flawless. He has a lovely cantabile, which he carries into the section following the short cadenza. The voices appear out of nowhere and disappear softly into the shadows, like smoke rising out of the end of a cigar. The overall effect is rather eerie and leads perfectly into the agitato passage. His interpretation of the second theme is rather unorthodox. He eschews the dotted rhythm in the "answer" section of the theme in favor of a straightforward reading. The result has a modern feel to it and is rather stylish, though not necessarily for that reason my cup of tea. The reprise of the theme in A Major is suitably grand. A lot of pianists fail to reach pea...