Skip to main content

Horowitz Plays Rach 3 (1943)

The recording I advert to is the one Horowitz performed with the NYPO under the baton of Artur Rodziński. The recording is infamous for cutting off the very beginning of the piece - possibly because the folks in charge of the recording equipment had chosen the wrong time to take a nap. In spite of that, this performance showcases Horowitz at his technical peak. It's executed at breakneck speed, with dazzling virtuosity that reminds one of The Road Runner Show, where the roadrunner leaves trails of fire in his wake, though not at the expense of the music - a feat that few have ever equalled. Certainly not clowns like Valentina Lisitsa, or even - I'm sorry to say - artists like Martha Argerich. This recording is sufficient to silence any latter-day critic and professional snob who dares to claim that Horowitz was overrated or didn't have a good technique. These snobs will meet a fitting end in obscurity soon enough, and Horowitz will continue shining in the firmament of classical pianism like the titan that he was.

Panegyrics aside, a recording surfaced on YouTube lately claiming to offer a restored version of this much-sought-after performance. Mister DakarDave did well to disable comments on the video, because his claim holds very little water. Are we to believe that the two-and-a-half minutes that have been missing for seventy-three years suddenly came into the possession of this unremarkable pseudonym in an obscure corner of YouTube? If I died right now, my corpse would continue laughing till the end of time. Unfortunately, I can't take credit for this colorful line, just as DakarDave can't take credit for weaving time out of thin air. As a matter of fact, I am all but certain that these two-and-a-half minutes are from Horowitz's 1941 recording, which is no longer on YouTube and as a result unavailable for inspection. Happily, I do have the 1941 recording, and can verify that the two-and-a-half minutes that DakarDave offers us, decked and wreathed like an icon of the Lord, is very likely from the 1941 recording, though it has been merged with the 1943 seamlessly. For the editing work alone Mister DakarDave deserves the highest praise. Ultimately, it's just as well that the 1941 was combined with the portions of the 1943 that we are fortunate to have, for a multitude of reasons:
  1. It's only two-and-a-half minutes long.
  2. The first two-and-a-half minutes of the piece are basic enough so that any recording by any except the most useless musicians (and sometimes even those: listen to Lisitsa) is apt to be similar in essence.
  3. Horowitz in 1941 and Horowitz in 1943 are apt to be more similar still.
  4. Horowitz himself spliced and diced in abandon, like a sushi chef who thinks he's alone in the kitchen.
  5. The continuity completes the listening experience.
Well done, DakarDave, old chap, well done. Next, we would all like you to produce from your magic bag a recording of Horowitz and Rachmaninoff playing the reduction for two pianofortes of this concerto. I'm sure, with your talents, you will be able to dazzle us once again with a timeless treasure.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Eileen Joyce Playing de Schlozer

It is safe to say that Eileen Joyce, one of the finest pianists of the last century, whose untimely departure from the concert stage and the recording studio sadly deprived her of the enduring fame and recognition that other pianists of the same caliber reaped in copious amounts, rose to prominence because of her studio recording of Paul de Schlozer's Etude in A-flat, about which I've already written at length on this blog. The story goes that Eileen Joyce, then not a professional musician, walked into the recording studio and recorded the de Schlozer etude, simply because she wanted to see how she sounded. She was signed on the spot. The famous recording of the de Schlozer etude was made in one take and went on to become the most celebrated recording of the piece. However, true to today's fashion of deprecating art and exalting pure technical accuracy, it is not uncommon to see people claim that Joyce's playing of the etude is "labored" compared to Geoffrey...

The Infuriating 'Un

This is something of a sequel to my post entitled the lugubrious gondola , in which I shall talk about why I find Beethoven so infuriating, when the rest of the world exalts him as music itself. (The nineteenth century conductor and Liszt pupil Hans von Bülow famously designated him as one of The Three Bs , whom he considered the only composers in history who were not cretins, if his word be taken at face value, alongside Bach and Brahms, rudely ousting Berlioz from his former place in that venerable trinity. Berlioz was probably put there in the first place because they couldn't find any other composer whose name started with B. An amusing anecdote: von Bülow was such an intellectual musician that he once conducted Beethoven's ninth symphony twice in a row so that his vulgar, uncultured audience, whose attention was limited by their vulgarity and unculturedness, could fully appreciate the greatness of that work. That's about as funny as musicology gets.) ...

Chopin's G Minor Ballade as played by V. Horowitz [Review]

Horowitz's interpretation of this piece changed little over the years - to the extent that his 1965 and his 1968 recordings of the piece are indistinguishable except upon closer inspection. I find that his rubati in the introduction are exaggerated and a little indecisive. His execution of the main theme is, however, flawless. He has a lovely cantabile, which he carries into the section following the short cadenza. The voices appear out of nowhere and disappear softly into the shadows, like smoke rising out of the end of a cigar. The overall effect is rather eerie and leads perfectly into the agitato passage. His interpretation of the second theme is rather unorthodox. He eschews the dotted rhythm in the "answer" section of the theme in favor of a straightforward reading. The result has a modern feel to it and is rather stylish, though not necessarily for that reason my cup of tea. The reprise of the theme in A Major is suitably grand. A lot of pianists fail to reach pea...